x:48 y:20
[ RATES / 08.13.2026 ]
[REDACTED] PHYSICIAN PRACTICES / PAYER RATE INVESTIGATION
12MO ADJUDICATED CHARGES + OPEN AR · 3 MARKETS · ALL ENTITIES · READ-ONLY

This group’s payer contracts run $1.60M a year below Medicare. 62% of that gap is one contract, and it grew wider in January.

This is a redacted copy of a client deliverable. Client, entity, department and geographic names, the home-state Blue plan’s network product names, and regional payer names are replaced with neutral codes (Market A/B/C, Group A1…, Plan B1…). All figures are unmodified.

Twelve months of adjudicated charges across three markets, priced payer by payer against Medicare, with the worklists for its $23.83M of open AR.

[ 00 ]

At a glance

Annual gap vs Medicare
$1.60M
top 18 codes by volume, negotiated contracts
BCBS-A pays
89%
of Medicare, provider-type matched
Largest single rate gap
$554K/yr
99214 · BCBS · Mkt A
Open AR
$23.83M
as of 08.07.2026, all entities
Held internally
$5.32M
28,811 claims in hold queues
Payer mix: where the $1.60M sits and how each contract prices Highlight
1k3k10k30k100k70%80%90%100%110%120%130%140%100% OF MEDICARECLAIMS% OF MEDICARE →BCBS · Market A · 89% of Medicare · 107,584 claims · $998,106/yrUnitedHealthcare · Market A · 96% of Medicare · 35,093 claims · $205,662/yrMedicare Advantage · Market A · 112% of Medicare · 144,842 claims · $94,002/yrCigna · Market A · 89% of Medicare · 11,550 claims · $91,538/yrAetna · Market A · 88% of Medicare · 7,381 claims · $63,061/yrBCBS · Market C · 100% of Medicare · 12,888 claims · $48,617/yrAetna · Market C · 76% of Medicare · 1,353 claims · $23,085/yrPlan B2 · Market B · 131% of Medicare · 6,139 claims · $12,956/yrUnitedHealthcare · Market C · 88% of Medicare · 1,290 claims · $12,089/yrCigna · Market C · 82% of Medicare · 826 claims · $12,009/yrMedicare Advantage · Market B · 116% of Medicare · 8,755 claims · $8,126/yrUnitedHealthcare · Market B · 137% of Medicare · 4,068 claims · $7,866/yrBCBS · Market B · 125% of Medicare · 12,336 claims · $6,333/yrPlan C1 · Market C · 93% of Medicare · 1,085 claims · $5,163/yrPlan B1 · Market B · 138% of Medicare · 4,761 claims · $4,840/yrAetna · Market B · 105% of Medicare · 1,404 claims · $3,728/yrCigna · Market B · 113% of Medicare · 2,600 claims · $3,722/yrMedicare Advantage · Market C · 98% of Medicare · 3,442 claims · $2,114/yrBCBS $1.00MUnited $206KMedicare Adv $94KCigna $92KAetna $63KBCBS $49KAetna $23KPlan B2 $13KUnited $12KCigna $12KMedicare Adv $8KUnited $8KBCBS $6KPlan C1 $5KPlan B1 $5KAetna $4KCigna $4KMedicare Adv $2K
One circle per payer group. Left of the dashed line means the payer pays under Medicare, higher up means more claims run through it, and a bigger circle costs more per year. The costly ones are big, high and to the left. Hover for a name. The market keys highlight one market inside this chart; they do not filter the figures anywhere else in the report.
Days to first paymentmedian per payer group, by market
Mkt A Cigna 8d → Employer/WC 29d
Mkt B Plan B2 4d → Medicare Advantage 27d
Mkt C Cigna 7d → Employer/WC 212d
0d10d20d30d+
One dot per payer group. Hover for the name; anything slower than 30 days sits on the right edge.
[ FINDINGS ] · click through to the evidence
1BCBS-A pays 89% of Medicare. Matching Medicare on the top 18 codes by volume is worth $1.60M/yr, and 62% of that is this one contract.01 →2BCBS-A cut the 99214 allowed amount on its main PPO to $75.49 in January 2026, the third consecutive half-year reduction from $88.22. Medicare rose to $100.35 over the same period. The January step lands on every plan product, from $5.00 on the main PPO to $12.73 on the federal employee plan.02 →3BCBS-A pays less than the rate it publishes: on Blue Network 2, the plan its machine-readable file matches by name, the file lists $81.80 for 99214 against the client’s tax IDs and the remits show $68.55. The largest plan shows the same pattern under the network mapping in 02.1.02 →481% of the gap sits in three payer groups, and office-visit codes carry 86% of the top-14 dollars.03 →5UnitedHealthcare MA HMO pays on a fixed 28-day cycle in Market A and Market B and 27 days at Market C, while Humana Gold Plus pays the same claim types in 8 days.06 →6$5.32M sits in internal hold queues rather than with a payer, $1.80M of it never billed to anyone. That is the money the client can move without a payer conversation.08 →
[ 01 / 08 ]

Rate gap vs Medicare, by payer

Gap = annual $ below 100% of Medicare, volume-weighted

The Medicare benchmark here is the client’s own Medicare FFS remits in each market, not a published fee schedule, so it already carries that locality’s geographic adjustment and the 2% sequestration reduction. Negotiated contracts ranked by annual dollars below Medicare, with the code-level detail on click. Codes where a payer pays above Medicare are not netted against the gap: the total is the sum of the shortfalls only. Because physician and NP/PA claims are priced separately, a code can sit above Medicare on the blend and still carry a gap where the NP/PA rate is short.

89% of Medicare → $1.00M/yr
BCBS-A · 62% of the total gap sits in one contract
81%
of the $1.60M gap is in the top 3 payer groups
9 of 18
payer groups, across all three markets, already pay at or above Medicare
Payer group
% of Medicare · dashed line = 100% of Medicare
% Medicare
Annual gap
BCBS Market A
89%
$998,106/yr
UnitedHealthcare Market A
96%
$205,662/yr
Medicare Advantage Market A
112%
$94,002/yr
Cigna Market A
89%
$91,538/yr
Aetna Market A
88%
$63,061/yr
BCBS Market C
100%
$48,617/yr
Aetna Market C
76%
$23,085/yr
Plan B2 Market B
131%
$12,956/yr
UnitedHealthcare Market C
88%
$12,089/yr
Cigna Market C
82%
$12,009/yr
Medicare Advantage Market B
116%
$8,126/yr
UnitedHealthcare Market B
137%
$7,866/yr
BCBS Market B
125%
$6,333/yr
Plan C1 Market C
93%
$5,163/yr
Plan B1 Market B
138%
$4,840/yr
Aetna Market B
105%
$3,728/yr
Cigna Market B
113%
$3,722/yr
Medicare Advantage Market C
98%
$2,114/yr
ranked by what each contract costs per year · under 90% of Medicare / 90–99% / 100% or better
Show the numbers · all 18 payer groups, code-level detail on click
PayerMarket% of Medicare12mo volume, top 18 codesAnnual gapLargest single code
+ BCBSMarket A89%107,584$998,10699214 · $554K/yr
+ UnitedHealthcareMarket A96%35,093$205,66299214 · $94K/yr
+ Medicare AdvantageMarket A112%144,842$94,00287428 · $40K/yr
+ CignaMarket A89%11,550$91,53899214 · $48K/yr
+ AetnaMarket A88%7,381$63,06199214 · $40K/yr
+ BCBSMarket C100%12,888$48,61799213 · $15K/yr
+ AetnaMarket C76%1,353$23,08599213 · $10K/yr
+ Plan B2Market B131%6,139$12,95687428 · $9K/yr
+ UnitedHealthcareMarket C88%1,290$12,08999213 · $4K/yr
+ CignaMarket C82%826$12,00999214 · $4K/yr
+ Medicare AdvantageMarket B116%8,755$8,12699203 · $3K/yr
+ UnitedHealthcareMarket B137%4,068$7,86687428 · $4K/yr
+ BCBSMarket B125%12,336$6,33387428 · $3K/yr
+ Plan C1Market C93%1,085$5,16399214 · $2K/yr
+ Plan B1Market B138%4,761$4,84036415 · $3K/yr
+ AetnaMarket B105%1,404$3,72899213 · $3K/yr
+ CignaMarket B113%2,600$3,72299213 · $2K/yr
+ Medicare AdvantageMarket C98%3,442$2,11487637 · $1K/yr

Visit codes are matched on rendering provider type († in the detail); on those rows both dollar figures are the provider-type-weighted blend, so the Medicare figure will not match the all-clinician median shown in section 05. Government and program payers (Medicaid, TRICARE/VA, workers’ comp) are excluded, since their rates are set by program rather than negotiated. Scope is the top 18 codes by volume in each market.

[ 02 / 08 ]

BCBS-A in detail

62% of the gap sits in this one contract
84%
of its own published rate on Blue Network 2, the plan matched by name · $431K/yr across three plans and two visit codes, $145K of it independent of the Network 1 mapping in 02.1
$88.22 → $75.49
99214 on the main PPO over four half-years, while Medicare rose to $100.35
41st percentile
where the client’s published Network 2 rate sits among the 34 other in-state organizations the file lists for 99214 · what BCBS actually pays falls below every published rate in that set
[ 02.1 ]

What BCBS publishes against what it pays

Payer’s own machine-readable file, 2026-07-27

Federal price-transparency rules require BCBS-A to publish the rate it has negotiated with every contracted provider. Its file, matched to the client’s five Market A tax IDs:

PlanCodeBCBS publishesBCBS pays% of publishedBilled 12moDifference per year
BCBS-A (PPO)*99214 $87.86$78.22 89% 19,793$190,805
BCBS-A (PPO)*99213 $56.90$48.11 85% 10,876$95,600
BCBS-A: Blue Network 2 (PPO)99214 $81.80$68.55 84% 5,937$78,665
BCBS-A: Blue Network 2 (PPO)99213 $52.97$38.42 73% 3,400$49,470
BCBS-A - Network 1 (PPO)99214 $87.86$80.49 92% 1,490$10,981
BCBS-A - Network 1 (PPO)99213 $56.90$50.13 88% 823$5,572

* BCBS-A (PPO) is the largest plan by volume but that plan name does not appear in the file. BCBS-A’s commercial PPO business runs on Networks 1 and 2, so the Network 1 schedule is assumed for it; the $144,688 on the two plans matched by name is the figure that does not rest on that assumption.

[ 02.2 ]

The January 2026 reduction, plan by plan

Median allowed for 99214 by half-year. The step down appears inside each plan product separately, so it is a rate change rather than a shift in which plans the client’s patients carry. The client’s own employee plan, new in 2026 and administered by the same BCBS-A, pays $90.49 for the same visit: 20% above the main PPO’s $75.49, and more than any commercial product in the table.

Plan product2024H22025H12025H22026H12yr changeCharges 2026H1
BCBS-A (PPO)$88.22$85.06$80.49$75.49 −$12.73 7,935
BCBS-A: BLUE NETWORK 2 (PPO)$85.06$85.06$75.06$68.55 −$16.51 2,527
BCBS-A$93.22$88.22$83.22$78.22 −$15.00 1,048
BCBS-A - FEP (PPO)$83.22$83.22$83.22$70.49 −$12.73 447
BCBS-A - CLIENT EMPLOYEE PLAN (PPO)–––$90.49 – 273
[ 02.3 ]

What the Blues pay the client in the other two markets

Three separate Blues licensees, each negotiated by its own market.

MarketPlanAllowed, 99214Medicare% of Medicare
Market ABCBS-A$76.22$100.35 76%
Market BBCBS-B / Regence$105.43$102.78 103%
Market CBCBS-C$107.57$106.44 MA 101%

Plain medians across all clinicians, so these will not match the provider-type-matched percentages in section 01. At Market C the comparator is Medicare Advantage, because Medicare FFS there pays the RHC all-inclusive rate.

[ 02.4 ]

What this does and does not establish

ItemNote
Two readings, both openEither BCBS is paying under a live contract, in which case the difference is recoverable, or its published file is stale and it is posting a rate it no longer honors. The observed series steps down evenly ($88.22, $85.06, $80.49, $75.49) and the published $87.86 sits near the 2024 level, which is consistent with a stale file. The client does not need to settle which it is before asking BCBS to reconcile the two numbers against the contract.
An unexplained second tierEvery provider group in the file carries two rates in a constant 1.345 ratio ($87.86/$118.22, $81.80/$110.06, $78.77/$105.99). The place code is the placeholder CSTM-00 on every row and the billing class is professional for both, so the file does not say what separates them. The lower tier is used above. If any real volume prices at the upper tier, the shortfall widens.
Group A5 carries two odd rates$34.86 and $53.63 on 99214 appear under the Group A5 tax ID and under no other entity. Excluded from the figures above and worth asking about separately.
Peer comparisonThe 32 to 35 other in-state organizations quoted here appear in the file because one of the client’s clinicians is also listed under their tax ID, so they skew toward affiliated and former-employer groups rather than a clean sample of in-state practices. Directionally useful; not a market benchmark. For 99214 the range across them runs $72.71 at the lower quartile to $261.98 at the top.
What a machine-readable file is worthThese files are the payer’s own assertion and are known across the industry to carry rates for providers who are not really contracted. The match here is on exact tax ID from the client’s own records rather than on clinician number alone, which is the stronger of the two, but it remains the payer’s number until the contract confirms it.
TimingThe file is dated 2026-07-27. Paid medians cover dates of service August 2025 through July 2026, so they span both sides of the January reduction; the 2026H1 column in 02.2 is the post-reduction figure.
[ 03 / 08 ]

Largest rate gaps by code and payer

$0.98M/yr
in the first three rows · all BCBS-A
$76.36 vs $91.45
BCBS on 99214, provider-type matched · $554K/yr on 36,731 visits
86%
of the top-14 dollars are office-visit codes
Code · payer
Annual gap vs Medicare
Allowed vs Medicare
99214 · BCBS Mkt A
$554K
$76 vs $91
99213 · BCBS Mkt A
$330K
$44 vs $60
87428 · BCBS Mkt A
$99K
$33 vs $69
99214 · UnitedHealthcare Mkt A
$94K
$84 vs $92
99213 · UnitedHealthcare Mkt A
$66K
$50 vs $60
99214 · Cigna Mkt A
$48K
$80 vs $93
99214 · Aetna Mkt A
$40K
$78 vs $92
87428 · Medicare Advantage Mkt A
$40K
$36 vs $69
99213 · Cigna Mkt A
$26K
$48 vs $60
87428 · UnitedHealthcare Mkt A
$21K
$35 vs $69
G0439 · Medicare Advantage Mkt A
$20K
$113 vs $117
99213 · Aetna Mkt A
$18K
$48 vs $60
83036 · Medicare Advantage Mkt A
$16K
$4.95 vs $9.52
99213 · BCBS Mkt C
$15K
$71 vs $73
bar length is what that code is worth per year if the payer moved it to the Medicare rate · color is the payer
Show the numbers · top 14 rows with volumes and Medicare rates
#CodeDescriptionPayerMkt12mo volAllowedMedicare allowed% of MedicareAnnual gap% of total gap
199214†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 4BCBSMkt A36,731$76$9183%$554,39534.6%
299213†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 3BCBSMkt A20,686$44$6073%$330,07720.6%
387428COMBO FLU A&B/COVIDBCBSMkt A2,776$33$6948%$99,4096.2%
499214†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 4UnitedHealthcareMkt A11,723$84$9291%$94,3985.9%
599213†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 3UnitedHealthcareMkt A6,765$50$6084%$66,2214.1%
699214†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 4CignaMkt A3,840$80$9386%$47,9863.0%
799214†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 4AetnaMkt A2,896$78$9285%$40,0712.5%
887428COMBO FLU A&B/COVIDMedicare AdvantageMkt A1,199$36$6952%$39,6392.5%
999213†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 3CignaMkt A2,081$48$6080%$25,6661.6%
1087428COMBO FLU A&B/COVIDUnitedHealthcareMkt A620$35$6950%$21,2041.3%
11G0439†ANNUAL WELLNESS VST; PPS SUBSQT VSTMedicare AdvantageMkt A4,366$113$11796%$19,6241.2%
1299213†OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 3AetnaMkt A1,488$48$6080%$17,9181.1%
1383036GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN TESTMedicare AdvantageMkt A3,479$4.95$9.5252%$15,8991.0%
1499213†OFFICE/OUTPATIENT VISIT ESTBCBSMkt C3,265$71$73*98%$14,9450.9%

† matched on rendering provider type (methodology, section 07). Observed medians are in section 05 and the workpapers. * compared to Medicare Advantage where Medicare FFS pays RHC encounter rates (Market C E&M).

[ 03.1 ]

Plan-level detail on the highest-volume codes

Market A · click a row for the plans behind it

The medians in the sections above blend every plan a payer sells, so quote the plan, not the blend. On 99214 the BCBS blend is $76.22, but the largest single plan, BCBS-A (PPO) at 19,793 claims, pays $78.22; Blue Network 2 ($68.55) and the federal employee plan ($70.49) are what pull the blend down. Out-of-state BlueCard plans with 50 or more claims run $70.49 to $90.49 on the same code. Allowed amounts and the Medicare figure here are plain medians across all clinicians, so they differ from the provider-type-matched numbers in sections 01 and 03.

Code · payerDescriptionAll-plan medianMedicare allowedPlans
+ 99214 · BCBSOFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 4$76.22$100.35141
+ 99213 · BCBSOFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 3$45.13$65.02113
+ 87428 · BCBSCOMBO FLU A&B/COVID$33.07$68.8849
+ 99214 · UnitedHealthcareOFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 4$84.46$100.3559
+ 99213 · UnitedHealthcareOFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 3$47.78$65.0241
[ 04 / 08 ]

Rate trend vs Medicare, 2021–2026

Every payer's allowed amount on 99213 and 99214 as a percent of the same year's Medicare, 2021 to June 2026. These read lower than section 01, which spans 18 codes and separates physician from NP/PA claims; BCBS-A is 71% here and 89% there. The Humana line ends at 2025: its commercial volume runs under 500 charges a year on these codes and falls below the 30-charge floor in 2026. Its Medicare Advantage plans are in the Medicare Advantage line.

BCBS -25pts
largest 5-year fall of any Market A contract · UHC -20, Aetna -17, Cigna -2
Even Medicare Advantage -19pts
124 to 105 since 2021 at Market A · every commercial line in that market is down over five years
Aetna −30pts Mkt B · −15pts Mkt C
5-year drift · Aetna is falling in both smaller markets; Market B splits: Plan B2, Plan B1 and UnitedHealthcare pay above Medicare on these codes, BCBS, Cigna and Aetna below
Market A · percent of Medicare, 99213+99214
80%100%120%100% OF MEDICARE202120222023202420252026 H1JAN 2026 PFS UPDATEMedicare Advantage105% 1y−1 5y−19Humana104% 1y−2 5y−0Cigna81% 1y+3 5y−2UnitedHealthcare79% 1y−9 5y−20Aetna75% 1y−9 5y−17BCBS71% 1y−17 5y−25
Market B
80%100%120%100% OF MEDICARE202120222023202420252026 H1JAN 2026 PFS UPDATEPlan B2116% 1y−11 5y+13Plan B1116% 1y−14 5y−6UnitedHealthcare109% 1y−9 5y−3BCBS97% 1y−13 5y+5Cigna85% 1y−7 5y−0Aetna76% 1y−10 5y−30
Market C · compared to Medicare Advantage (Medicare FFS pays RHC encounter rates here)
60%80%100%100% OF MEDICARE202120222023202420252026 H1JAN 2026 PFS UPDATEBCBS93% 1y−6 5y+4UnitedHealthcare89% 1y−2 5y−1Cigna71% 1y−8 5y−19Aetna65% 1y−5 5y−15

Right-edge changes are in percentage points of Medicare (red falling, green rising). Points need 30+ zero-balance charges per code per year; 2026 covers January through June; the marker is the annual physician fee schedule update.

[ 05 / 08 ]

Allowed amounts by code and payer

DOS Aug 2025 – Jul 2026

One table per market; contracts differ by entity. Dollar figures are observed medians. Red = under 90% of Medicare; green = above 115%; bundled = packaged into another service, not priced separately; † = the percentage is matched on rendering provider type while the dollar figure beside it is the plain median across all clinicians, so a daggered percentage will not reproduce from the two dollar figures in its row (methodology, section 07).

TOP 18 CODES BY 12-MONTH VOLUME · SWITCH MARKETS ABOVE
CodeDescriptionBilled 12moMedicare FFSMedicare AdvantageMedicaid & managed MedicaidBCBSUnitedHealthcareCignaAetnaOther commercial & TPA
99214OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 4175,634$100$101 114%†$82 82%$76 83%†$84 91%†$79 86%†$81 85%†$191 190%
99213OFFICE VISIT- EST PT.- LEVEL 391,909$65$69 109%†$54 83%$45 73%†$48 84%†$47 80%†$51 80%†$103 159%
G2211VISIT COMPLEXITY INHERENT TO EVALUATI42,548$11.59$14.49 131%†$12.95 112%$14.49 127%†$14.79 128%†$13.77 120%†$0.01 · policy$18.19 157%
99204OFFICE VISIT- NEW PT.- LEVEL 425,799$119$130 116%†$125 105%$133 120%†$141 125%†$117 103%†$111 99%†$183 153%
96372THERAPUEUTIC23,660$10.13$11.59 114%$16.39 162%$23 229%$27 268%$18.66 184%$14.95 148%$24 238%
81003URINALYSIS AUTO WO SCOPE18,599$2.20$1.33 60%$1.13 51%$1.60 73%$2.16 98%$1.16 53%$1.69 77%$4.30 195%
93010ELECTROCARDIOGRAM REPORT16,248$6.25$7.26 116%$6.61 106%$10.37 166%$8.94 143%$8.20 131%$8.67 139%$22 347%
87880STREP A ASSAY W/OPTIC15,913$16.20$9.73 60%$8.27 51%$16.53 102%$11.02 68%$7.40 46%$12.40 77%$32 195%
G0557ADVANCED PRIMARY CARE MANAGEMENT SERV14,913$40$42 124%†$43 108%$17.13 36%†$47 129%†––$51 127%
99203OFFICE VISIT- NEW PT.- LEVEL 314,775$79$78 100%†$82 103%$75 100%†$80 100%†$66 83%†$67 90%†$111 140%
93000ELECTROCARDIOGRAM- COMPLETE14,249$10.04$11.92 119%$12.72 127%$18.05 180%$19.29 192%$13.42 134%$13.77 137%$32 319%
87804INFLUENZA ASSAY W/OPTIC11,873$16.22$9.93 61%$8.28 51%$16.55 102%$9.37 58%$7.61 47%$12.41 77%$32 195%
83036GLYCATED HEMOGLOBIN TEST10,943$9.52$4.95 52%$4.86 51%$6.93 73%$6.67 70%$5.06 53%$7.28 76%$9.70 102%
J1010INJECTION, METHYLPREDINISOLONE ACETAT9,702$3.73$3.76 101%$4.66 125%$4.66 125%$4.40 118%$4.80 129%$4.80 129%$5.28 142%
87428COMBO FLU A&B/COVID8,511$69$36 52%$32 46%$33 48%$35 50%$53 78%$73 107%$66 96%
J1100DECADRON 1MG8,216$0.41$0.38 93%$0.55 134%$0.47 115%$0.44 107%$0.55 134%$0.48 117%$0.92 224%
99232SUBSEQUENT HOSPITAL CARE8,056$53$66 125%†$59 112%$85 164%†$77 144%†$67 127%†$63 118%†$80 150%
G0439ANNUAL WELLNESS VST; PPS SUBSQT VST8,032$127$110 96%†$104 81%$112 98%†$108 95%†$110 86%†$111 100%†$110 86%
[ 06 / 08 ]

Days to first payer payment

Claims first billed May 2025 – Apr 2026

First claim submission to the first payer payment posting on the claim.

28 / 28 / 27 days · Mkt A/B/C
UnitedHealthcare MA HMO pays on a fixed cycle in all three markets · Humana Gold Plus pays the same claim types in 8 days
26d the Medicare Part B contractor
Market B is slowest for Medicare FFS, Medicare Advantage, BCBS, UnitedHealthcare and Cigna · in Market A, Aetna (20d) and UnitedHealthcare (17d) trail Cigna (8d)
4d but 68% ≤90d
Plan B2 has the fastest median of any payer group yet a third of claims have no payer payment inside 90 days
Market A
Payer group
Median days, first bill → first payment (bars cap at 40d)
days
Tail
Employer, WC & institutional 1,029 claims
29d
slowest 10%: 143d · 54% paid ≤90d
Aetna 8,009 claims
20d
slowest 10%: 33d · 77% paid ≤90d
UnitedHealthcare 32,374 claims
17d
slowest 10%: 29d · 76% paid ≤90d
Medicare FFS 89,283 claims
16d
slowest 10%: 38d · 91% paid ≤90d
Medicare Advantage 134,889 claims
15d
slowest 10%: 29d · 94% paid ≤90d
BCBS 104,737 claims
14d
slowest 10%: 23d · 80% paid ≤90d
Medicaid & managed Medicaid 92,717 claims
13d
slowest 10%: 21d · 87% paid ≤90d
Other commercial & TPA 19,744 claims
12d
slowest 10%: 59d · 79% paid ≤90d
Military & VA 8,967 claims
9d
slowest 10%: 27d · 87% paid ≤90d
Cigna 12,390 claims
8d
slowest 10%: 31d · 77% paid ≤90d
Market B
Payer group
Median days, first bill → first payment (bars cap at 40d)
days
Tail
Medicare Advantage 11,670 claims
27d
slowest 10%: 34d · 94% paid ≤90d
Other commercial & TPA 5,554 claims
27d
slowest 10%: 93d · 61% paid ≤90d
Employer, WC & institutional 3,262 claims
26d
slowest 10%: 77d · 73% paid ≤90d
Medicare FFS 16,215 claims
24d
slowest 10%: 61d · 91% paid ≤90d
UnitedHealthcare 5,098 claims
21d
slowest 10%: 41d · 73% paid ≤90d
Aetna 1,892 claims
18d
slowest 10%: 39d · 72% paid ≤90d
BCBS 13,830 claims
17d
slowest 10%: 31d · 71% paid ≤90d
Cigna 3,474 claims
14d
slowest 10%: 37d · 72% paid ≤90d
Military & VA 1,549 claims
13d
slowest 10%: 63d · 85% paid ≤90d
Medicaid & managed Medicaid 13,747 claims
9d
slowest 10%: 32d · 90% paid ≤90d
Plan B1 5,920 claims
9d
slowest 10%: 20d · 78% paid ≤90d
Plan B2 7,178 claims
4d
slowest 10%: 64d · 68% paid ≤90d
Market C
Payer group
Median days, first bill → first payment (bars cap at 40d)
days
Tail
Employer, WC & institutional 182 claims
212d
slowest 10%: 212d · 23% paid ≤90d
Other commercial & TPA 1,143 claims
33d
slowest 10%: 128d · 49% paid ≤90d
UnitedHealthcare 1,103 claims
19d
slowest 10%: 31d · 83% paid ≤90d
Medicare FFS 12,127 claims
16d
slowest 10%: 27d · 90% paid ≤90d
Aetna 1,096 claims
12d
slowest 10%: 27d · 86% paid ≤90d
Medicare Advantage 9,719 claims
10d
slowest 10%: 29d · 95% paid ≤90d
BCBS 11,775 claims
10d
slowest 10%: 21d · 83% paid ≤90d
Military & VA 852 claims
10d
slowest 10%: 32d · 89% paid ≤90d
Medicaid & managed Medicaid 21,454 claims
10d
slowest 10%: 27d · 89% paid ≤90d
Plan C1 935 claims
9d
slowest 10%: 31d · 88% paid ≤90d
Cigna 713 claims
7d
slowest 10%: 42d · 75% paid ≤90d
Show the numbers · per-group stats and plan-level detail on click
Market A
Payer groupClaims billed 12moMedian days to first paymentSlowest 10%Paid ≤30dPaid ≤90d
+ Employer, WC & institutional1,02929d143d36%54%
+ Aetna8,00920d33d69%77%
+ UnitedHealthcare32,37417d29d71%76%
+ Medicare FFS89,28316d38d85%91%
+ Medicare Advantage134,88915d29d89%94%
+ BCBS104,73714d23d77%80%
+ Medicaid & managed Medicaid92,71713d21d83%87%
+ Other commercial & TPA19,74412d59d66%79%
+ Military & VA8,9679d27d81%87%
+ Cigna12,3908d31d71%77%
Market B
Payer groupClaims billed 12moMedian days to first paymentSlowest 10%Paid ≤30dPaid ≤90d
+ Medicare Advantage11,67027d34d82%94%
+ Other commercial & TPA5,55427d93d42%61%
+ Employer, WC & institutional3,26226d77d44%73%
+ Medicare FFS16,21524d61d67%91%
+ UnitedHealthcare5,09821d41d61%73%
+ Aetna1,89218d39d65%72%
+ BCBS13,83017d31d65%71%
+ Cigna3,47414d37d63%72%
+ Military & VA1,54913d63d72%85%
+ Medicaid & managed Medicaid13,7479d32d83%90%
+ Plan B15,9209d20d75%78%
+ Plan B27,1784d64d62%68%
Market C
Payer groupClaims billed 12moMedian days to first paymentSlowest 10%Paid ≤30dPaid ≤90d
Employer, WC & institutional182212d212d3%23%
Other commercial & TPA1,14333d128d27%49%
+ UnitedHealthcare1,10319d31d74%83%
+ Medicare FFS12,12716d27d86%90%
+ Aetna1,09612d27d82%86%
+ Medicare Advantage9,71910d29d90%95%
+ BCBS11,77510d21d80%83%
+ Military & VA85210d32d81%89%
+ Medicaid & managed Medicaid21,45410d27d84%89%
+ Plan C19359d31d81%88%
+ Cigna7137d42d65%75%

Medians and p90 count paid claims; the percentage columns divide by all billed claims. A claim can resolve with no payer payment at all (deductible plans, capitation), so the percentage columns are not denial rates. Self-pay and provider-based-billing plans are excluded, as are payer groups under 100 claims. Window and recipe in methodology, section 07.

[ 07 / 08 ]

Methodology & audit notes

Show methodology · how these rates were derived and what to watch
ItemNote
Allowed amountAthena's ALLOWABLE field is unpopulated in this data share, so allowed = payer payments + patient cost share (copay, deductible, coinsurance) on zero-balance charges (nothing left owing on the line, payer paid > 0). Validated against the charge-minus-contractual method; the paid-plus-cost-share figure is the stable one and matches the industry definition.
Medicare allowedMedian Medicare FFS allowed from the same data, per code per market: the payer's own adjudications, not an external fee schedule. Derived Medicare payments embed the 2% sequestration reduction, so the benchmark runs slightly below the published fee schedule and the gap is understated by the same margin. At Market C, Medicare FFS pays RHC all-inclusive encounter rates on E&M (identical $98.78 across visit levels), so E&M and G-code comparisons there use Medicare Advantage, which adjudicates at fee-schedule-like rates.
Rendering provider typeMedicare pays services billed under an NP or PA at 85% of the physician fee schedule, and each payer’s share of NP/PA visits differs, so on visit codes (99xxx/Gxxxx) physician (MD/DO/DPM) and NP/PA claims are compared separately, each to its own Medicare rate, then weighted by that payer’s own share. The Market A data reproduces the 85% rule to the cent (99214 NP/PA Medicare median $85.30 = $100.35 × 0.85). The NP/PA Medicare rate is derived as 85% of the physician median because the observed NP/PA Medicare medians at Market B and Market C contain RHC encounter rates. Provider-based-billing entities contribute no volume to these codes.
Gap mathAnnual gap = the payer’s actual 12-month billed-claim count on that code × the per-claim difference (matched on provider type for visit codes, Medicare minus allowed elsewhere), provider-type strata priced below Medicare only, negotiated contracts only. Volumes are exact counts per payer × code, not apportioned estimates. Medicare Advantage counts as negotiated; Medicaid and managed Medicaid, TRICARE/VA and workers’ comp do not.
Volume basisThe gap prices the full 12-month billed volume at the per-claim difference. This values the contract terms; cash recovered in a year also depends on how much of that volume resolves with payment. Billed and zero-balance counts are side by side in the workpapers.
Zero-balance selectionMedians use zero-balance charges only, which could in principle skew toward claims that adjudicate cleanly. Two checks say it does not. Pricing the gap two ways: blending physician and NP/PA medians together gives $2.40M/yr for this window, while comparing the two separately, which is what the $1.60M headline uses, is the more conservative of the two. Rerunning the blended version on the mature July 2024 to June 2025 window, where every charge has had 13+ months to adjudicate, gives $1.72M/yr. That drop is rate change, not selection: BCBS-A (PPO) 99214 allowed $85.06 in the mature window versus $75.49 after the January 2026 reduction, while codes whose contracts did not move reproduce to the cent across both windows (UnitedHealthcare (State A) 99213 $52.78 in both; BCBS-A 87428 $33.07 in both).
WorkpapersEvery modeled row (market, code, payer group, exact billed and zero-balance counts, median allowed, the Medicare rate, annual gap, and the physician and NP/PA splits behind provider-type-matched rows) is in redacted-rates-workpapers.csv, including the Medicare allowed rows, government and program payers excluded from the gap math, and bundled codes, each flagged with how it was treated.
Bundled codesCode and payer combinations allowing under 20% of Medicare (e.g. Aetna paying $0.01 on G2211) are payment policy, not rates: flagged "bundled" and excluded from all math. G2211 also resolves on only ~2% of BCBS-A submissions: a claims-policy dispute worth raising separately.
Lesser-of checkContracts typically pay the lesser of billed charges or the contracted rate, so a fee set too low would cap payment and look like a bad contract. Every code and payer combination was checked for payment at or above billed charges: only 3 hit 15%+, two of them RHC encounter-rate artifacts. The fee schedule is not capping payment; the contracted rates are the constraint. This scan was run separately and is not reproduced in the workpapers.
Contract termsThis report measures what payers paid, not what contracts obligate. Effective dates, escalator clauses and lesser-of language live in the client’s contract files and are the other half of any rate conversation. The January 2026 BCBS-A reduction in section 02.2 should be read against the contract in force at that date.
Medians & blendingFigures are medians per billed line, so J-codes reflect typical billed units. Payer groups blend plan products (PPO/HMO/exchange); section 03.1 breaks the highest-volume Market A codes down to the Athena insurance package so the numbers taken into a negotiation are plan-level, not blended. Each figure needs 8+ zero-balance charges.
Billed chargesCharges were used only to test for lesser-of exposure, not as a benchmark. A payer's allowed amount as a percent of billed charges carries no information the percent of Medicare does not: the charge appears in both the payer's ratio and Medicare's, so it cancels, and (payer % of charges) divided by (Medicare % of charges) equals the percent of Medicare exactly. the client's fee schedules also mark up inconsistently, from roughly 2x Medicare on venipuncture to 15x on urinalysis, so a percent-of-charges figure mostly reflects which codes a payer covers. A payer paid on a genuine percent-of-charges contract would need its own treatment; none of the negotiated groups here are.
Days to first paymentSection 06 takes claims first billed May 2025 through April 2026, so every claim has had 100+ days to be paid as of this pull. First billed = earliest FIRSTBILLEDDATE on the claim; first payment = earliest payer payment posting (payer-side, non-voided). Payer groups follow the same classification as the open-AR breakdown in section 08.1, with Plan B1, Plan B2 and Plan C1 split out to match the rate sections; self-pay and provider-based-billing packages are excluded. Medians and p90 are computed over paid claims; the ≤30d and ≤90d columns divide by all billed claims.
[ 08 / 08 ]

Open AR worklists

As of 08.07.2026

$19.53M payer-side, $4.30M patient-side, 124,197 open claims, 16 entities. Worklists first, the full AR below.

What to do firstclick any priority to open the worklists
1
$5,322,787INTERNAL HOLD QUEUES
Release the held backlog. $5,322,787 across 28,811 claims sits in manager, CBO or Athena hold queues instead of with a payer; $1,804,855 of it has never been billed to any payer at all.
+
Where to start · the held pool by work bucket, in order
#BucketClaimsHeld $Next step
1Never billed, service date under 90 days6,063$1,596,544Release now. These are keyed and coded but were never sent, and the filing windows are still open.
2Never billed, service date over 90 days881$208,311Triage this week: at or past typical filing limits. File with proof of delay or write off deliberately.
3Billed once, then returned to an internal hold queue, stale 180+ days9,760$1,792,065Work by kick reason. Manager-hold rows here have a median 181 days since last touch.
4Billed before, held under 180 days6,375$1,419,234Routine review; watch that this bucket clears rather than aging past 180 days.
5Hold on the secondary claim, not the primary5,732$306,633Same review as buckets 1–4; the hold sits on the secondary claim status, so these do not appear in the service-date buckets above.
By entity
EntityMarketClaimsHeld $Never billed $Median claim ageMedian days untouched
Group A2Market A7,856$1,624,995$971,59971d45d
Group B2Market B2,723$805,968$166,109242d93d
Group A1Market A4,318$800,374$174,513193d49d
Group C1Market C4,604$782,545$71,028305d116d
Group A5Market A3,234$534,016$112,336197d56d
Group A3Market A2,498$456,162$179,277155d57d
Group A6Market A2,317$328,815$40,999198d60d
Group B1Market B1,438$307,610$50,729164d53d
Group C2Market C676$122,459$11,091168d39d
Group B3Market B660$117,881$13,429454d112d
Group C3 (PBB)Market C582$103,725$13,167256d65d
Group B5Market B115$16,888$0532d239d

The entity table counts claims with a hold or follow-up status on either the primary or secondary claim, so it totals $6,001,438 against the $5,322,787 hold-queue pool above, and $1,804,277 of never-billed dollars against the $1,804,855 in buckets 1 and 2.

Group A2 holds the most: $1,624,995, $971,599 of it never sent (4,033 claims, median age 71 days). Filing limits govern the timing here.

2
$3,652,716AGED PAYER AR
Work the aged payer AR in four worklists. $3,652,716 of payer AR is 180+ days old, and $2,041,209 across 6,252 claims was billed 45+ days ago with no payer response on file.
+

These four worklists cut across the full payer AR on their own criteria. They overlap the 180-day pool above rather than summing to it.

#WorklistClaimsPayer $Next step
1Billed 45+ days, zero response on file6,252$2,041,209Batch claim-status inquiries; confirm receipt, rebill what never landed. Median age 158 days.
2Credentialing & enrollment kicks1,817$514,761One enrollment-team project: resolve the credentialing flag and e-submission enrollment, then rebill the list at once.
3Claim-data error kicks801$256,351Coder rework queue: fix and resubmit; filing clocks apply to corrections.
4Duplicates & review/appeal flags2,469$372,946Fast disposition pass: close true duplicates, decide appeal or adjust on the remainder.
3
$4,304,636PATIENT BALANCES
Send the statements that never went out. $489,842 of statements are queued but were never sent (10,844 claims, median 71 days stale), and $3,331,033 of patient balances is under 180 days old, where collection rates are highest.
+
#ItemDollarsNext step
1Release the statement queue$489,842Release the hold and mail the statements. No collections program required.
2Work balances under 180 days first$3,331,033Deductible-dominant ($987,272) and direct self-pay ($908,012) lead. Only $99,117 is on a payment plan today.
3Decide the 181+ day balances deliberately$973,603Agency placement or write-off, entity by entity; $178,683 is already at agencies.
[ 08.1 ]

Open AR by site, payer, code, entity, kick

Group
Open AR
Payer / patient
Payer detail names the 130 largest plans; CPT detail attributes each claim's balance to its lead billable code. The age filters apply to the site, payer and CPT views only; the entity and kick-reason views are not broken out by age.